14 - The Road by Cormac McCarthy
It is hard to explain the absolutely traumatizing, horrifying experience of reading The Road. I read it in one day - it seemed appropriate, seeing as how it had no chapters, no breaks, had no quotation marks for dialogue, and was just completely unrelenting, unforgiving, and devoid of any hope. It has stayed with me for over a month now; I will be walking along and then stop in my tracks, remembering some horrifying image from the book. The Road takes place somewhere on the East coast of the U.S., after an apocalypse; the reason for the devastation is never clearly stated, although the fear and chaos leading up to it is remembered in flashback. The landscape described by McCarthy sounds like a nuclear winter - the air is cold, ash constantly blows through the air, there is no wildlife or plantlife. A man and his young son travel south, trying to find the coast, where they think life will be better. Anyone they see is automatically suspect, and therefore avoided. They stay out of the cities as much as possible, going through houses and stores to find canned goods and supplies to survive. None of the characters have names; they are only referred to as ‘the man,’ ‘the boy,’ or whatever title is the least trouble to identify them. There are hardly any scenes involving anyone other than the man and the boy.
The book is good. It is written well. I will give it that. But I really doubt if the message, the impact of the book is worth the reading of it. I mean, do I need to read about roving bands of cannibals with young boys they use as sexual slaves, or about an underground cellar of people being harvested for their limbs to feed said cannibals, or about a baby roasting on a spit in order to understand that people have bad sides?
Do I need to know about these specific horrors, in a world where wildlife - plant, animal, sea, everything - has died, to know that the environment is important, and that nuclear winter would be a bad thing?
Do I need to read about the main character stripping another man of his clothes and only possessions at gunpoint to know that those who label themselves as ‘good’ are making relative judgments, and are sometimes not deserving of the labels they give to themselves?
I’m lapsing into the rhetorical question book review; but I really question whether the message and the quality of the book is worth how disturbing it is - and not in a horror movie, I’m scared of things that go bump in the night disturbing, but a deep, bone-chilling fear of humanity, along with a fear of what the future holds for us.
This book is so bleak, so tragic, and so terrifying that I almost wish it had not been written. Reading The Road is an exercise in masochism. I read it myself because I thought a friend who was reading it was wrong, or exaggerating about how terrifying, nightmarish, and relentless it was; she is, in fact, right about all those things. It is hopeless, grim, and arguably pointless. However, it does not compare to any other book I have read, ever. It creates a thoroughly believable and compelling world, and the spare language, the lack of quotation marks or names, the focus only on the road ahead and survival in the telling of the story seems to echo the character’s mindset: in a world this dangerous, and with so little food or warmth, they seem able only to manage the basic brain function necessary to survive.
The despair and greyness of the characters leaches onto you as you read, making The Road impossible to shake. I can’t help but be torn, wondering if it is the great cautionary tale that reviews made it out to be; or just hopelessness and horror for it’s own sake.
January 21st, 2009 at 11:52 pm
I mean, do I need to read about roving bands of cannibals with young boys they use as sexual slaves, or about an underground cellar of people being harvested for their limbs to feed said cannibals, or about a baby roasting on a spit in order to understand that people have bad sides?
Whaaaaaat. The fuck. I kept hearing about how good this book was, so I borrowed it from a friend the other day. I’m gonna be handing that shit back now.
January 22nd, 2009 at 12:44 pm
Sabrina - good move.
August 25th, 2009 at 11:40 am
Hey, have some respect Sabrina! This is one of the most horrific yet prolific pieces of writing I have come across in a long time. It is brutally honest and sometimes the truth is the ugliest thing you will ever hear, see or read. I admire McCarthy for having the talent and guts to tell a story of truth like this. This novel was so profound and heartbreaking for me, I read it twice in order to fully grasp it and now I feel compelled to write a critical essay on my thoughts of the book. My college community here is extremely involved in recent moving literary works and we anticipate the upcoming premier of the movie in October. This written work was awarded the Pulitzer Prize. It is not “shit” but literature and people like you make other readers, students and literature buffs alike ashamed.
January 3rd, 2010 at 2:01 pm
Well said Vanessa
January 4th, 2010 at 4:57 pm
Hey, I appreciate that folks have different opinions, but I think a lot of people are not understanding just how difficult ‘The Road’ can be to read for some of us. I know people who had nightmares after reading it, and did not think the literary value was at all proportional to the trauma that they experienced. Others read the book, and got a lot out of it, and did not feel the story living in their heads and making them afraid in the same way.
Also, a statement like ‘people like you make other readers, students and literature buffs alike ashamed’ is pretty smug, and erases the possibility of individual interpretation. I’m not saying your comment went so far into this territory, but I don’t like the attitude that I sometimes encounter that if you don’t like a certain work (novel, film, music) you either ‘don’t get it’ or you don’t have good taste. People can dislike ‘The Road’, even hate it, or think it is just not that well-written (I have read some bad reviews) and simply have different tastes, or like different styles.
However, this is the single book that I read during Cannonball Read 1 (possibly ever in my life) that has grown most in stature after reading it, such that it has a permanent place in my consciousness. I do need to re-read it. For me, it is the kind of work that is ultimately incredibly enigmatic, such that I don’t feel I could ever truly understand everything in it, even if I spent a whole lifetime.
June 15th, 2010 at 9:55 pm
thanks for the above new post.
January 4th, 2011 at 10:46 am
It didn’t deserve the Pullitzer. It just didn’t. The characters are one-dimensional. Given his life story, the boy would have something more to him than big-eyed innocence, than flat-out purity. McCarthy could have answered the question he poses — what might life be like after an apocalypse? — with more imagination, wit, hope, and guts. It’s easy to be a naysayer. Also making the setting completely post-apocalyptic was a neat way to avoid the rigors of fictional creation. Plus women get a pretty bad rap in the book — the mom gave up while the dad persevered to care for the boy. The book does not ring true.