Dear Bar Review Lecture Guy,
It would be much appreciated in the future if, when you tell the story of the will you successfully contested, you refrain from referring to the the young woman that an elderly man married as a ‘young thing.’ It makes it pretty clear that you don’t see her as a human, but as an object.
Furthermore, the fact that when she had a ‘legitimate occupation,’ - legitimate in your opinion - she was a stripper has nothing whatsoever to do with the eventual outcome of the case. There is absolutely no reason for you to mention this except to emphasize that you think she is a dirty, dirty member of the sex caste and is not entitled to any money from her husband - and you know nothing about that relationship except that he was old and she was young. Somehow, in your mind, he’s the victim, despite the fact that she has probably been groped and assaulted by men, and then was cheated out of the things promised to her in her husband’s will.
Please refrain from commenting beyond what I need to know to pass the fucking test.